It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It will actually be valuable for you to go for the services of a top lawyer in the event that you want to present such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. It is evident that nonprofit as well as charity organizations are not allowed to finance any of these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.
